InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 120
Posts 17674
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/21/2012

Re: 1jk1 post# 51127

Thursday, 04/08/2021 2:15:03 PM

Thursday, April 08, 2021 2:15:03 PM

Post# of 82424
It should be noted that municipal waste wouldn’t be cost effective for the Medi - see below comments from Snpw.
It appears they are going after a niche market yet some want to correlate the billions and billions of waste to the Medi - not sure this is an accurate correlation.

“It’s a very expensive technology to use, but because of the type of tipping fees that we’re charging based on the products that we’re taking, which is medical waste, it’s at a higher level so it offsets the cost. If we just doing regular municipal waste it wouldn’t be cost-effective for us to operate that facility with that. … This is very expensive technology, very expensive equipment. Hopefully, after there’s more production and more being built of this type of product hopefully it will reduce the cost of this type of equipment.”

My opinions.

https://www.ecori.org/composting/2021/2/28/px6rp9yomqfvz2tdhtshv720ca6dn1

Ps. Let’s just get the Medi approved and move forward - let’s see what we have. I think R.I. Owes this to Snpw. In the meantime it appears the Dem and the politicians are arguing. Let’s get the Medi operational.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SNPW News