![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Saturday, April 03, 2021 11:42:38 PM
A 1.2% reduction in what? New case rate? Existing cases?
What's the control? If no masks had been used, would cases have gone up 50% instead? Or 400% perhaps? You need a comparison.
You also have to look at cause and effect. Places with higher population densities naturally had faster spread, which lead to more mask wearing. Places with very low population densities could get away with lower mask wearing, so they did, and you can point to that and say "see, less mask wearing and less cases", but there are outside factors affecting both and correlating them.
To truly see the effects, you'd need places with similar densities, similar habits, and similar case loads, but one with more masks than the other. Those comparisons are hard to find.
Simple Stock Loans Announces Unique Solutions For Investors Looking for Alternative Liquidity Amidst Recent Small Cap Rally Sep 6, 2024 9:30 AM
Reliant Coffee Debuts at #271 on the Inc. 5000 List of Fastest Growing Companies - Coffee Service Industry Disruptor Brews Up Exponential Growth Sep 5, 2024 11:51 AM
VAYK Confirms Receiving Revenue from First Airbnb Property with 1.4 Million Annual Revenue Goal • VAYK • Sep 4, 2024 9:34 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Expands Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: New Lens Intercepts 21.75 m at 5.25 g/t Gold & 515 ppm Cobalt • MFL • Sep 4, 2024 9:02 AM
Integrated Ventures Acquires 51% Stake In GetTrim.Com (TM), Telemedicine Platform With Focus On Expansion Into Booming GLP-1 Powered Weight Loss Market • INTV • Sep 4, 2024 8:45 AM
Avant Technologies Announces Strategic Review Process Intended to Maximize Shareholder Value • AVAI • Sep 4, 2024 8:00 AM