InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 1043
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/12/2019

Re: toogoodfella post# 92808

Friday, 04/02/2021 6:16:53 PM

Friday, April 02, 2021 6:16:53 PM

Post# of 111148
Let me continue to correct your errors. Only material lawsuits with a high probability of losing need to be reserved. Not all lawsuits. And even if there is a reserve, it does not have to be 100%.

Unless you know of another indivudual suing on a guarantee claim or entity, its probably waske and crew being reserved for. I dont see anything on the dockets on any other dispute recently relating to a guarantee claim outside of the settle ecaps. But, I will admit that I am not sure the reserve is for waske. That goes the same for the 37 million. Those are two possibilites.

As I stated, j. Chapman and the plan admin istrator do not recognize our subordinated guarantee in this bk. The proof is in the transcripts and their actions. They ignored every singled provision of the subordinated guarantee in court and with their actions. They will be consistent and ignore the subordinated guarantee all the way even the no discharge because if they are not consistent, they will open themselves up to liabilities.

So if WWW dont win, you are right SELL because the CTs will get nothing but a discharge from the bk.

If you think the plan admin will give you a free ride into the new entity, you are more gullable than I thought.

Now, lets hear your argument. Tell me how there is no lawsuits and how the CTs will magically get shares of the new company? Lol