InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 3152
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 11/09/2006

Re: king oil post# 15694

Friday, 04/02/2021 9:44:17 AM

Friday, April 02, 2021 9:44:17 AM

Post# of 18418
King...as for 99% of the people working for HDC being thieves I don't believe that to be true not that high of a percentage.

When I look at all the history through the many years it still falls on the CEO. We were thankful the Quirk invested in HDC which it saved us back then. We watched him jump back and forth from Director stance to almost typical retail investor by the way he acted at different time siding with Barnhill and or other directors then bringing suit on HDC. It seems everyone or most of the directors kept their mouth shut and their heads down and I say this because the truth of that would be why would you stay involved as a director under the circumstances that existed. My answer to that is two fold...they either don't care about shareholders but need to try and control what the CEO does or doesn't do so they don't lose their shares or share strength as long as they can or they know they are powerless yet was it only ONCE that we seen the directors raise up against "Scott" and I bet he could tell us a few stories of truth...and would like to hear if he wanted or didn't want to go after certain entities or what?

This is all spilled milk and so much has been spilled is probably why all the old directors might be talking to one another but could be pinned down due to a multitude of variable reasons.

It would seem a lawsuit as we have seen with Quirk, Moore and Bear was for what and how does that seem to vanish? Is Bear related to Quirk in some manner and why would Quirk leave Bear standing alone? This seems to me another reason why I don't trust Quirk.

Now with Moore and SVM Capital where did that twist or was that as I feel a Barnhill shuffle just to showcase another avenue. Was it a matter of HDC not being able to raise money and what did Richard Caruso do with the SVM technologies when he left the company.

We have all these professionals on Exhibit B not challenging the company and it would be interesting on why? Sure things are probably being discussed but as usual us retail investors are treated like trouble makers when all we ever wanted was a fair shake and truth.

Why haven't these directors on Exhibit B contacting the SEC with their direct complaints. Is it not worth it, will they be cutting their own throats? Why is this company so closed to their shareholders if they are truly are looking out for their shareholders just maybe they are? and maybe they aren't.

So! spilled milk that we guarantee will never dry up and blow away.