Fannie Mae (FNMA)

[Robert from yahoo bd]

"As of yet, nobody has seen Lady Justice stick her head out from behind the curtain so we're not really sure she is there."

Really, did you even bother to read the 16 Judge 5th Circuit EnBanc Ruling? (Don't they have reading time at the nursing home?)

What were the holdings by the Majority there?

Why don't you ask the person who is in charge of changing your Depends, exactly what this means:

"Twelve of the Fifth Circuit's sixteen en banc judges held that (1) the Shareholders' statutory claim can proceed on remand and (2) FHFA's novel structure is unconstitutional. By a 9-7 vote, a different en banc majority held that the only remedy available for the constitutional claim was to sever HERA's for-cause removal provision and for that reason rejected the Shareholders' pleas that the Court set aside the FHFA-Treasury deal at issue. If you break it all down, four of the judges in the majority on the remedies issue (a decisive number on that issue) dissented from the separate majority opinion regarding the constitutional issue.

The opinions are well-worth reading in full."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.admin.law/collins-v-mnuchin-938-f-3d-553-5th-cir-september-6-2019/amp/