InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 25
Posts 2345
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/20/2020

Re: misiu143 post# 154046

Monday, 03/22/2021 1:41:06 PM

Monday, March 22, 2021 1:41:06 PM

Post# of 233005

Maverick you are right ..one may call it anecdotes , or not ,

But as Dr Patterson said , in some patients there is no question that Leronlimab was responsible for patient surviving ..As he said..

" Anecdotes don't come off life support "


Someone coming off of life support is an anecdote. That is exactly the definition of an anecdote. There is absolutely no way to know if leronlimab was the reason. If something good happens after you do something, people will assume whatever you did is the reason. Philosophy academics call this fallacy "post hoc ergo propter hoc" which means after the fact therefore because of the fact. This is why trials are done. To figure out if the anecdotes have any legitimacy. And leronlimab's trial failed spectacularly which indicates that leronlimab was not responsible for the patients' improvments.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CYDY News