Sigma Labs Inc (SASI)

[VisionaryInc]

yeah, or probably the writer, paid by the operators of 3DPrintingIndustry, who provide regular updates on investments in AM, including data and analytics of the AM industy notified the companies mentioned, or Sigma's PR simply picked up on a 3rd party article after it was written and posted.

The writer and website in question provide industry news as well as investment activity in the AM space,
doing extensive research in the happenings and trends of the field and surrounding technologies.

Considering Sigma Labs is currently in contract with Airbus, they cannot legally comment on the business operations of a company other than their own.

Sigma probably felt it appropriate to maintain a waiting period before citing an article containing their customers operations while under contract.

instead of the random idea that the writer posting under the "news" column of a well-known industry website was picking random old facts "from years ago" and not current industry happenings that he's regularly involved in and constantly in talks with the industry professionals currently participating in the field.

to claim this article was speaking of outdated items, seems inaccurate as Sigma's IR wouldn't have then cited it in a press release.

another theory proven wrong with 30 seconds of rational thought.

its amazing to witness the blindness necessary to fit a failing agenda, in my opinion

Sigma inside

Do DD

glta

https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/airbus-mass-3d-prints-waveguide-parts-for-latest-eutelsat-satellites-184619/