InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 70
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/19/2020

Re: None

Monday, 03/01/2021 9:26:46 AM

Monday, March 01, 2021 9:26:46 AM

Post# of 19369
FYI, I don't believe the firm's subsidiary was lying about their face mask; graphene has highly proven antimicrobial, antivirus properties. But, they made the right move in just focusing on ZapGo technology. The real question is why ZapGo couldn't launch given all of the supposed benefits of the technology. Shareholders better hope that the reason ZapGo couldn't get off the ground was 100% due to Isaac being a total putz in managing a business. It does take a unique skill set to actually be successful as a CEO. ZapGo got a lot of press / media in 2016-2017, but, maybe Isaac paid for that PR as he was having trouble getting parties interested. I don't know what to make of Nikola; they were a fraudulent firm with a criminal CEO / founder. And, the $8M does seem like a very light offer, especially considering Nikola owned no proprietary technology of their own. So, maybe Isaac actually made a smart decision in not selling at a low valuation. But, then again, 100% of zero is still zero. It's certainly possible, given the increase in patents to 70, that the technology has since evolved materially. Proof will be in 1) closing the transaction and 2) finding a partner to commercial it. There's certainly a better chance of that with the firm 100% focused on ZapGo and with Andrew as CEO and not Isaac. At the current valuation, and the technology potential, it's certainly worth a purchase of shares. But, you have to be very patient until there is more liquidity and a better exchange.