InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 655
Posts 19192
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 07/03/2011

Re: GloblDefensInitiativ post# 6744

Thursday, 02/25/2021 7:41:18 PM

Thursday, February 25, 2021 7:41:18 PM

Post# of 6773
Stockholder Lawsuits



Beginning on February 16, 2021, four lawsuits were filed by purported Company stockholders (captioned Dillion v. Helix Technologies, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-01365 (filed February 16, 2021 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York) (the “Dillion Complaint”); Baros v. Helix Technologies, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-01425 (filed February 17, 2021 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York) (the “Baros Complaint”); Anderson v. Helix Technologies, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-00464 (filed February 17, 2021 in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado) (the “Anderson Complaint”); Robinson v. Helix Technologies, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-00484 (filed February 18, 2021 in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado) (the “Robinson Complaint” and together with the Dillion Complaint, Baros Complaint and the Anderson Complaint, the “Complaints”)). The Complaints were filed against (a) the Company and (b) the members of the Company’s Board (the “Individual Defendants”) and the Baros Complaint was also filed against Forian, MOR and Merger Sub. The Complaints generally allege that the defendants violated Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), by, among other things, failing to disclose material information in the Proxy Statement regarding the sales process, reconciliation of certain financial projections regarding the Company certain inputs underlying Management Planning, Inc.’s financial analysis, and potential conflicts of interest of involving the Company’s insiders. The Complaints also allege the Individual Defendants (and the Baros Complaint alleges Forian, Merger Sub and MOR) violated Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act as controlling persons who had the ability to prevent the Proxy Statement from being materially false and misleading. The Complaints seek, among other things, an injunction against the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and an award of costs and expenses, including a reasonable allowance for attorneys’ and experts’ fees
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.