InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 5833
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/03/2018

Re: None

Wednesday, 02/24/2021 1:26:17 PM

Wednesday, February 24, 2021 1:26:17 PM

Post# of 12542
SEC conviction in identical case to UAMA.

Benoit Laliberte claimed "NO" to question in Pink disclosure documents to question on "prior convictions in past ten (10) years! Clearly a falsehood as there is evidence that the Court's decision on the AMF appeals resulted in Judges decision finding Mr. Benoit Laliberte guilty of three (3) additional counts in 2009. Evidence is clear and unambiguous!

Brooks did same thing only he was small time compared to the 44 convictions amassed by Benoit Laliberte for stock fraud, market manipulation and deceiving investors.

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2012/comp22442.pdf