Sunday, February 21, 2021 12:28:10 PM
But why did the SEC wait until the share price started to appreciate before they shut it down?
That seems very suspicious to me...
Could it be that the previous bagholders were the MMs and naked shorters? And they wanted out, so they started to drive the price up and sold it all to the new bagholders (at which point it was suspended)?
The SEC could have suspended the company a long time ago when it was at no-bid and it wasn't trading. Why didn't they? Why did they wait? Was it because the MMs and naked shorters would have been hurt?
I find it very curious that when large hedge funds lose money, the government bails them out (with taxpayer money), but when retail investors (like us) start to make money, well then, that shouldn't happen... let's shut it down...
Why are brokers & market makers allowed to front-run investors? Why isn't that illegal? They are basically using "inside information" to trade and make money on a constant basis.
Why is naked shorting allowed? It is supposed to be illegal. Why isn't the SEC doing anything about that?
Why is the focus always on the retail investor? Why are they always trying to "save us"?
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM