InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 269
Posts 8044
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/14/2009

Re: RumplePigSkin post# 666924

Friday, 02/19/2021 2:58:08 PM

Friday, February 19, 2021 2:58:08 PM

Post# of 798314
i guess my point is that..

my base case doesn't have scotus ruling on the math behind any of that.

just basically re-confirming the en banc's interpretation of HERA and that plaintiffs have a valid claim; and then the case gets remanded back to lower court to review...

so i'm not expecting the massive judgment you seem to be suggesting is imminent.