Home > Boards > US OTC > Internet - Information/Portals > Inventergy Global, Inc. (INVT)

My opinion is that because Apple was paying

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (2) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
jackieadams75  Member Profile
 
Followed By 0
Posts 63
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/08/17
160x600 placeholder
jackieadams75   Friday, 02/12/21 07:30:31 AM
Re: Kongol626 post# 2544
Post # of 2609 
My opinion is that because Apple was paying Panasonic for the same licenses that INVT is holding that at one time Apple even agreed that they were valid. The patents cover the core of 3g and I think 4g lte. I believe the original judge waited on the results from the government case. It became political and INVT had no chance of winning. Some of the political bias has been stricken down by other judges. Apple even counter sued to stop this case and their counter suit was dismissed. The original case is still going and was delayed by COVID. The possible recovery is licenses for every IPhone produced in the past 8 years. This could be a very large number and willful patent infringement is awarded triple the damages. I believe all of the costs of Fortress will be paid as court costs in addition to the award. I am long and holding until the end. It is Apple’s MO to extend lawsuits until the company suing is bankrupt. Fortress has very deep pockets.

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (2) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist
Consent Preferences