Robert, am I speaking to the same person that wrote his agenda i sometime in May 2001? An agenda that was so much more to the benefit of the shareholders than the Settlement? You had a vision and a mission, when and why did you lose both?
You say:
"I am somewhat surprised that you would think, we plaintiffs would put your agenda ahead of what was the best possible outcome for all Loch Shareholders. Your agenda Imo, was not in the best interest of Loch shareholders."
Now, are you trying to put words in my mouth? What I did, I did in the best interest of Loch shareholders, that is, justice and retribution. You want me to remind you what my agenda was? Here:
By: lmorovan
27 Mar 2003, 09:27 AM EST Msg. 177994 of 178242
This is what I want:
UNCONDITIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF CDEX SHARES AS PROVIDED IN THE ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT;
THE RETURN OF TENS OF MILLIONS OF LOCH SHARES, FREELY AND UNJUSTIFIABLY GIFTED AWAY BY THE MEMBERS OF THE BOD OF LOCH;
THE FAIR AND JUST RETRIBUTION TO ALL LOCH SHAREHOLDERS OF THE TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS EXTORTED FROM LOCH SHAREHOLDERS.
If what I want is wrong, then I will lose my case. If it is just, fair and right, then WE WILL ALL WIN.
JOIN ME AND LET'S WIN THIS ONE!
Never assume I would have done anything that you or anyone else would have. I would have never been part of such a one sided, manipulated Settlement Agreement. I stated before, and continue to state, that there was never a need to negotiate with the Boys. The Derivative Action, as it was presented, would have smashed them. You demanded a shareholders meeting with the purpose to vote in a new BOD that would have distributed (not exchanged) the CDEX shares to shareholders. Loch would have been saved, you stated in some of your posts that it was your intention to save Loch. Any jury would have granted the demands of the Derivative Action. Of course, a summary judgment would have not rendered such a hefty benefit to the lawyers, so it was never submitted.
Your last paragraph makes me laugh. What other option did shareholders had, after so many years of frustration and despair? It is clear to me that all parties involved in the settlement capitalized on the anxiety of shareholders, and even provided safe guards against anyone willing to hold the wrong doers accountable.
You have promised many things to shareholders and delivered something very different from what you promised. That is not right in my books.
