InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 308
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/20/2017

Re: piker86 post# 22735

Tuesday, 02/09/2021 12:40:24 AM

Tuesday, February 09, 2021 12:40:24 AM

Post# of 23245
To summarize my previous post, here is the history of reverse splits and dilution through self payments

June 2018, reverse split down to 3.5 million shares, company issues 50 million shares to itself, reducing the intrinsic value of all outstanding shares by over 90%

Dec 2019, reverse split down to 11.7 million shares, company issues 50 million shares to itself, reducing the intrinsic value of all outstanding shares by 80%

Feb 2021, 40 to 1 reverse split will reduce shares down to less than 4 million shares….will they continue the pattern and issue another 50 million shares to themselves as they have before? If so, this will dilute the intrinsic value of all existing stock by over 90%.

If you have any doubt they are going to issue another 50 million shares to themselves, think about their 8-k statement on the reason for a 40 to 1 reverse split. They said it was to make the stock compliant with OTCBB requirements. The minimum price requirement for OTC stocks is 1 penny per share, to stay compliant. They could achieve that with a 4 to 1 reverse split, the current price of around 0.005 would go up to 2 cents. Why 40 to 1? Because after they dilute the stock with their 50 million share self payment, increasing the number of shares by more than a factor of 10, the ownership associated with each share will drop by 90%. So they have to do a 40 to 1 reverse split instead of 4 to 1 to account for the 50 million shares they are about to add.