Transmeta (Semiconductor) (TMTA)

[stack]

I know, I know. I read the paper. My first impression was, Intel let an intern do the job and copy all defenses from a standard law text book. Honestly, I didn't find anything unexpected. In Intels case I would have done the same to stall Transmeta. The question is how much merit does all of this have. That will be decided by the judge and the jury in a fair manner, no matter how hard either party tries. See, because they use any possible kind of defense, certain defensive points start to contradict each other. E.g. on one hand they state certain patents should be invalidated and that Transmeta received them unlawful, while shortly thereafter they ask the judge to nullify TMTAs claims based on the same patents because Transmeta didn't sue Intel for that patent fast enough. LOL. It's somewhat of a joke, and shows how thin the ice is that Intel walks on. Expect most points of both parties to be thrown out by the judge, however in the end I see Transmeta in the stronger position here.
Of course you will see that differently.