InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 561
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/10/2020

Re: SooS416 post# 39844

Thursday, 01/28/2021 10:00:17 PM

Thursday, January 28, 2021 10:00:17 PM

Post# of 48717

...people just didn't like it because it took the hype/momo ability away.




Not true, I'm one of those people that did not like the post. I am what you would call a long term investor in $STHC, been here for months, avg. ~$0.03, planned to stay for a year or more with PT ~>$1. I did not like the PR because it fomented uncertainty, creates doubt to the plan that Mark himself laid out. Also, rather than admitting there are issues and providing new goal posts for schedules and targets, it was full of revisionist descriptions and weasel words.

Also, I disagree with the notion that Mark should be the final Arbiter of the share price. The claim is it was necessary to crash the stock, but I ask, what if the SP did not crash and built a new base at ~$0.10 without the PR...

Clearly the PRs obvious ramification was goodwill destruction will just cause less stability in SP. Evidence: many of the most loyal longs on this board have trimmed their positions substantially recently.

Like myself, this stock's story has a way of converting those attracted by hype/momo into long term holders. Recent communications have undone that attraction. IMO