Acacia Diversified Holdings Inc (fka ACCA)

[billy28227047]

Connecting the DOTS.
As you are aware, ACCA is owned by a holding company "ORCIM Financial Holdings, LLC" that is solely and privately owned by Jeff Bearden. At this point we can only take ACCA as a shell company due to no news or official info coming out about it. It’s just sitting there doing nothing officially.

Digging into the SEC filings of ACCA, they show Jeff/ ORCIM Financial Holdings, LLC. buying “Series B Convertible Preferred Stock” and gives him voting control of ACCA. Preferred stock, unlike common stock, is typically given to investors in young companies, and the company and the investors negotiate the terms. Venture capitalists typically receive convertible preferred stock when they invest in a startup. In this case, as stated in the SEC filing, each share of the Preferred Stock has fifty (50) votes per share and may be converted into fifty (50) $0.001 par value common shares. As the result of the issuance of the Preferred Stock, ORCIM Financial Holdings, LLC has voting control over the Company with 73,750,000 votes on all matters submitted to stockholders for a vote.

https://sec.report/Document/0001380389-20-000004/

But if we look at the official business documents filed; we see that the “Articles of Organization” for ORCIM Financial Holdings, LLC state this:

“3. The purposes for which the Company is formed are to engage in the business of To acquire, hold, manage, sell, and hypothecate investment vehicles to the public, and for any business agreed to by the members pursuant to the Operating Agreement of the Company.”

[Use https://egov.maryland.gov/BusinessExpress/EntitySearch and search for ORCIM Financial Holdings, LLC. Look at the “Filing History tab in the results” to see the full “Articles of Organization”].

From here, we know that Jeff did not keep/renew the patents/contents of ACCA. So, what could he be using ACCA for then? My honest opinion is he is using it to reverse merge ORCIM Financial Holdings, LLC into. Which would make ACCA officially his holding company on market. I would start looking at the scale and focus of it being like $GD, $LDOS, $BAH as I believe he is building the company into I.T. powerhouse as those.

I do not see any supporting evidence of Jeff using ACCA with cannabis at this time. Why? Look at his background and look at the team he is building up under ACCA in the filings. Additionally, look at the removal of the older owners/staff of ACCA.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1001463/000118518520000840/acaciadiv20200610_8k.htm
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1001463/000118518520000904/acaciadiv20191231_10k.htm
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1001463/000118518520001216/acaciadiv20200630_10q.htm
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1001463/000118518520001072/acaciadiv20200806_8k.htm
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1001463/000118518520001086/acaciadiv20200331_10q.htm

[in case you wish to see all filings: https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=&match=&CIK=ACCA&filenum=&State=&Country=&SIC=&owner=exclude&Find=Find+Companies&action=getcompany ]

While people have been speculating about what is going into ACCA, I believe you now have your first piece of public info into what Jeff is building up and possibly throwing under ACCA.

The following link gives an official view that has many names we may already know or not associated yet. Also look at the full list of defendants. Notice the "Defendant DOES 1 through 10, inclusive". If you look on the full list, you will see more of the connecting DOTs. There are "9" private companies (Synrgy, B&D Consulting, P3, etc...). Jeff has links to all the companies listed. He either owns [or is in the middle of taking over] the private companies and "2" public companies (ACCA, SNGY).

Those of you with an account, can see the full list and see all the gems!
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/37594863/Kennedy_et_al_v_Bearden_et_al

Along with the connection of all companies to Jeff, this case looks like Jeff are doing a hostile takeover of a new company (http://acembly.com) to add to his belt/ACCA. As you can see the CEO and the CTO/Co-founder of Acembly are suing Jeff and the own company they HAD worked for (Acembly). Why else would Michael Asadoorian and Patrick Kennedy sue Acemby and Jeff? I can only hypothesize they believe they are owed more then they got or were possibly even fully cut out of any profit from takeover.

Patrick Kennedy - Co-Founder | CEO - Acembly
https://www.linkedin.com/in/pkacembly

Michael Asadoorian - CTO / Co-Founder Acembly
https://www.linkedin.com/in/michaelasadoorian

But with what looks like Jeff performing a hostile takeover of Acembly this early, I think there will be many surprises with ACCA coming. That info is public as you see in the links. just not publicly stated by jeff/ACCA yet. Fairly sure he wants to get some ducks in a row before next filing. which is why I would think he is taking the extensions for ACCA.

So why would Assembly be a big milestone he wants to accomplish before making any official statements? Look at what Acembly does [www.acembly.com]. Cloud!!!!

Now look at that and think about Jeff’s work with his other companies. They are either Government consulting or they created technology for cloud use. Why is that important? I think this list shows what Jeff is after. Keep this in mind with DoD. Start with the following list:

JEDI:
https://www.cloud.mil/JEDI-Cloud/
https://www.crn.com/news/cloud/microsoft-azure-creates-top-secret-government-cloud-as-jedi-battle-rages-on

milcloud 1.0:
https://www.shrgroupllc.com/news-events/shr-awarded-disa-milcloud-1-0-sustainment-contract/

milCloud 2.0:
https://www.milcloud2.com/
https://www.cloud.mil/milcloud-20/

DEOS:
https://www.cloud.mil/deos/

AWS:
https://aws.amazon.com/government-education/defense/

Cloud One:
https://software.af.mil/team/cloud-one/

CIA’s Commercial Cloud Enterprise:
https://www.nextgov.com/it-modernization/2020/11/exclusive-cia-awards-secret-multibillion-dollar-cloud-contract/170227/

DoD now has how many clouds with unknown number of workloads continuously shifting between them? And this is where Acembly comes in.
https://cloud.report/on-demand-webinar/how-to-simplify-data-management-with-hybrid-cloud/3917
YouTube video, [17:13 starts the Acembly focus]:

Shifting gears, lets go back to the list of defendants in the Acembly case above. There was a company in the mix that raises some questions. P3 Partners LLC.
http://www.p3partnersllc.com/mission.html

The website hasn't been updated since 2013. So be aware the P3 company bigger and much more modern then currently shown. I think we need to get ready for a big visual overhaul on this company.
http://www.p3partnersllc.com/news.html

Maybe the previous owner/CEO is looking to get on with his retirement. Which would be the reason that he may have sold to Jeff.
http://www.p3partnersllc.com/ceo.html

Can you see a possible trend of build-up of "small" tech and government consulting firms for Jeff yet? Would make sense that he would throw all of them under one umbrella. And I think this is were ACCA is coming into the picture.

I would highly suggest looking into Jeff to get a glimpse of his thinking.

What Jeff can do with a company.
https://www.inc.com/profile/b-d-consulting

Follow his previous paths of growing a company.
https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/183269-35

https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeff-bearden-8678891

And I believe it is these public pieces of Info above is what helps explain why ACCA is jumping around in PPS even outside the P&D by people thinking this is a cannabis play. Now keep in mind that by federal law, Jeff cannot be dealing with cannabis if he is wanting to deal with the Government and their contracts.
https://www.safeaccessnow.org/federal_marijuana_law
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/ACCA/quote#trade-data


While this is my opinion and it may be off, I do believe the dots fit well together. But I guess we will not know for sure till Jeff puts out ACCA fillings.