Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (IPIX)

[To infinity and beyond!]

Here is an interesting question: why pretend there is a high likelihood of success for B vs C in the coming trial? Why would anyone say this, when it is obviously false. The share price tells you what the world thinks about the chances of B success- not good.

Why then are some asserting otherwise? They bought at 10 cents and want to sell at 50 cents? is it really bogus, and pretenders to be big B boosters are in reality just playing a game?

There is no scientific basis for such silly claims, as we all realize, so why? Those saying it do not comprehend the difference between lab data and a human trial? Can it be that simple? Silly nonsense about 11, 552 and 426 means B stomps C- in patients?

It is hard to fathom. The market is well-aware of where things stand.

Are people just afraid of losing money? Their investment here might be lost if the trial fails, and so the "high likelihood" nonsense mantra gets repeated?

Why pretend B v C chances are better than they are?