InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 1022
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/11/2006

Re: T-Hawk post# 41196

Wednesday, 01/20/2021 11:14:14 AM

Wednesday, January 20, 2021 11:14:14 AM

Post# of 47618
You need to put the data in context. At 30 gpm, the two carbon filters were capturing all the PM from the pregnant solution. At 60 gpm, however, that appears to be not the case; hence, the extra filters being delivered. Even then, PT is predicting only 85% recovery at the 60 gpm rate. Apparently, the cost analysis said that gave the most bang for the buck. Of course, the percentage "missed" by the carbon filters just goes back in the pond to be re-filtered.

If I remember correctly, the MC is designed to be used at a still higher flow rate - up to 800 GPM(?). When the flow reaches the required minimum, I'm sure they'll switch.

The problem with reporting real-time data is that it fluctuates constantly. PT reported the most recent readings he had at the time.
Since he takes readings several times a day, that can be confusing at times.

Dino