InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 55
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/14/2018

Re: None

Wednesday, 01/20/2021 4:48:57 AM

Wednesday, January 20, 2021 4:48:57 AM

Post# of 81999
presentation of a research scientist at VTT who is validating PR3D

https://mfg40.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/VTT-Reijonen-process-monitoring-LUTseminar.pdf

from their comparison to optical tomography and CT it seems that PR3D might be more sensitive to defects than optical tomography, although simply measuring time-over-threshold (ie how long is the part too hot at a given region) is seemingly just as predictive as PR3D.

anyone some ideas?