![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Wednesday, January 13, 2021 5:18:12 PM
p 10 under section III
The district court’s order is based on FDA’s interpretation that the word “HCT/P’s” in section 1271.15(b) means “HCT/P’s in their original form,” where the “original form” factor is derived from FDA’s guidance but is nowhere in the regulation itself. FDA contradicts the lower court’s order by arguing on appeal that the SSP Exception in unambiguous, yet FDA nowhere provides an argument based solely on the words of the regulation itself.
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM
ECGI Holdings Targets $9.7 Billion Equestrian Apparel Market with Allon Brand Launch • ECGI • Jun 25, 2024 8:36 AM
Avant Technologies Addresses Progress on AI Supercomputer-Driven Data Centers • AVAI • Jun 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Expands International Presence with New Partnership in Dubai • GRLF • Jun 24, 2024 8:30 AM
Bemax Inc. Positions to Capitalize on Industry Growth with New Improved Quality of Mother's Touch® Disposable Diapers • BMXC • Jun 24, 2024 8:00 AM
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM