InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 4518
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/28/2006

Re: badog post# 343627

Saturday, 01/09/2021 4:54:23 AM

Saturday, January 09, 2021 4:54:23 AM

Post# of 360921

If I owned 400 million shares I would dream up a narrative to keep others from bailing.

BULLSHIT, because it's the other way around, my friend: he didn't own the 400 million shares already, and had to 'dream up' a bullshit scenario to be able to get rid of these shares immediately again, after he bought them... this bullshit narrative suggests that certain news that hit the wire made him change his mind about owning large amounts of shares in ERHC. But there hasn't been any news, except for some promising news like a revocation that is postponed for very good reasons.

Bam!

I will debunk another real BULLSHIT narritive here:

I remember a BULLSHIT narrative that suggested that ERHC did not put out PR's because there was literally nothing worthwhile to report by ERHC, not even promotional bullshit (The narrative implied that ERHC dearly wanted, but unfortunately couldn't come up with anything whatsoever..., they had supposedly no lipstick left for this piggy). Now read this. It's about Caveat Emptor stocks. ERHC is probably the most fiercely discussed 'shell' company ever?

https://www.securitieslawyer101.com/2014/caveat-emptor/

The OTC Markets Group identifies securities with a Caveat Emptor symbol when it is probable that there is a lack of adequate public information about the issue. The Caveat Emptor designation is used to warn investors that there may be reason to exercise additional care and perform thorough due diligence in making investment decisions about that particular security.

Do they mean here that we all need to "look at the share price" more frequently? No. I think they mean that one needs to do TRUE DD when investing in a Caveat Emptor stock... like the longs did.

Promotion/Spam Without Adequate Current Information

The security is being promoted to the public, but adequate current information about the company has not been made available to the public. Adequate current information must be publicly available during any period when a security is the subject of ongoing promotional activities. At such instances, as a matter of policy, when adequate current information is not made available, OTC Markets Group will label the security “Caveat Emptor.” Promotional activities may include spam email, unsolicited faxes or news releases, whether they are published by the company or a third party.

Houston... we have a problem here? No, Houston, we don't have a problem:

The question that immediately pops up here is: why aren't/weren't Peter & Sylvan putting out promotional PR bullshit? This does not add up... Why hasn't ERHC told the 'Market' ANYTHING EVER about the litigation? They could at least have communicated that they won a court case, etc, etc? Certainly would have qualified for the label: good 'promotional activities'.

So let's establish here that we can say with certainty that ERHC is not your typical 'Caveat Emptor' company.
And this is important to establish. Why? Because these companies (still) exist for a reason (indeed): Making Money $$$.

Now WHY isn't and wasn't ERHC putting out promotional (bullshit?) information in any way, shape or form over the last years? Not a single word...

Let's assume here for one moment that the whole litigation trajectory itself was started as a very shrewd way of promoting this company's liveliness, etc: then WHY did ERHC abstain from promotion this litigation COMPLETELY, over all these years!?! Not ONE word we've seen...

So, now WHAT is going on here!?!

Investor relations or stock promotion involves the dissemination of information about a public company to INCREASE its stock PRICE and trading VOLUME. The person who publishes this information is sometimes referred to as a “Stock Promoter”. A Stock Promoter engaged in investor relations might use email, internet, direct mail newsletters, stock websites, press releases and phone rooms to increase trading volume and price of an issuer. While investor relations activities are not per se illegal, Stock Promoters are often the target of both civil and criminal authorities.



Again: what is going on here!?! I can tell you what is NOT going on here:

*This company is not kept from bankruptcy for all these years, just to facilitate the spreading of promotional bullshit by one person, who even had to buy up to 400 million shares, just to be believable at all.

*This company did not defend itself against a looming revocation, just to be able to 'pump' the stock for an additional period of time.

*This company did not stop reporting and filing, just to be able to INCREASE its stock PRICE and trading VOLUME, during an additional period of time.

So, tell me: why wasn't ERHC putting out promotional bullshit over the last 3 years, while they WERE engaged in fierce litigation. Why was it an Ihub poster, instead of the company itself, that had to make us aware of the excistance of ongoing litigation over EEZ block 4, early march last year!?!

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=154165759

I 'think' longs are holding on to their ERHC shares for very justifiable reasons. They will wait for developments, isn't that a no brainer in this situation, my friend?

Check-mate.

50 MILLION SHARES, it feels good. Really, it does. Will ERHC be the new Bitcoin? Bam!