Followers | 24 |
Posts | 4518 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 02/28/2006 |
Saturday, January 09, 2021 4:54:23 AM
Bam!
I will debunk another real BULLSHIT narritive here:
I remember a BULLSHIT narrative that suggested that ERHC did not put out PR's because there was literally nothing worthwhile to report by ERHC, not even promotional bullshit (The narrative implied that ERHC dearly wanted, but unfortunately couldn't come up with anything whatsoever..., they had supposedly no lipstick left for this piggy). Now read this. It's about Caveat Emptor stocks. ERHC is probably the most fiercely discussed 'shell' company ever?
https://www.securitieslawyer101.com/2014/caveat-emptor/
The question that immediately pops up here is: why aren't/weren't Peter & Sylvan putting out promotional PR bullshit? This does not add up... Why hasn't ERHC told the 'Market' ANYTHING EVER about the litigation? They could at least have communicated that they won a court case, etc, etc? Certainly would have qualified for the label: good 'promotional activities'.
So let's establish here that we can say with certainty that ERHC is not your typical 'Caveat Emptor' company.
And this is important to establish. Why? Because these companies (still) exist for a reason (indeed): Making Money $$$.
Now WHY isn't and wasn't ERHC putting out promotional (bullshit?) information in any way, shape or form over the last years? Not a single word...
Let's assume here for one moment that the whole litigation trajectory itself was started as a very shrewd way of promoting this company's liveliness, etc: then WHY did ERHC abstain from promotion this litigation COMPLETELY, over all these years!?! Not ONE word we've seen...
So, now WHAT is going on here!?!
Again: what is going on here!?! I can tell you what is NOT going on here:
*This company is not kept from bankruptcy for all these years, just to facilitate the spreading of promotional bullshit by one person, who even had to buy up to 400 million shares, just to be believable at all.
*This company did not defend itself against a looming revocation, just to be able to 'pump' the stock for an additional period of time.
*This company did not stop reporting and filing, just to be able to INCREASE its stock PRICE and trading VOLUME, during an additional period of time.
So, tell me: why wasn't ERHC putting out promotional bullshit over the last 3 years, while they WERE engaged in fierce litigation. Why was it an Ihub poster, instead of the company itself, that had to make us aware of the excistance of ongoing litigation over EEZ block 4, early march last year!?!
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=154165759
I 'think' longs are holding on to their ERHC shares for very justifiable reasons. They will wait for developments, isn't that a no brainer in this situation, my friend?
Check-mate.
50 MILLION SHARES, it feels good. Really, it does. Will ERHC be the new Bitcoin? Bam!
Recent ERHE News
- Form SC 13G - Statement of acquisition of beneficial ownership by individuals • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/06/2024 07:31:22 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/08/2023 09:06:42 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 06/28/2023 05:35:35 PM
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM