You quote the key part of my post, and then totally fail to address it!
"pumping DECN through new false claims, or false stock purchases, or false rumors, with only small exceptions."
I'll say it again. 3rd time? The content of his posts is a nit part of the case against him. There are about 3 replies, not one has refuted what I said.
If I said it didn't rain yesterday, and someone responded, "but it was cloudy", and someone else said, "but is was 50 degrees", would that show that my statement was wrong? Well that is what I am seeing here.
Okay then, again, I said the content of his posts here is a nit. Is the fact he hid his identity have anything to do with the content of his posts? Then why have this in the reply to me?
Okay then, again, I said the content of his posts here is a nit, and now you post that he lied when he said to the SEC that he didn't post on the board. Nowhere have I said otherwise. How is this part of a reply against what I said about post CONTENT?
Then you said
"The use of the message board alias, without actually registering or identifying the actual author, is obviously an important component of the DOJ's criminal prosecution." and yet the only thing you have as proof of this is that it is in the document. That doesn't mean it is an important part of the case. It just means it is part of the case.
The real important part of the case is this, he doesn't and never had a working test, and claimed and implied he did, to profit from those claims. He communicated this PRIMARILY through press releases! How is this even debatable? Step right up! Anyone! Post right here that Berman's posts on this message board is a key part of the case, not what I bolded in this paragraph!
What part of him purgering himself has to do with the CONTENT of his posts? Nothing. Zero!
How many posts of his are quoted in the documents? Now look at the ARYC case. How many posts are quoted in that one?
How in the world does anyone try to refute my point about post content, without quoting a single bit of content in his post content history? HOW?
