InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 7680
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 04/22/2010

Re: Coreton post# 47093

Tuesday, 01/05/2021 9:40:09 AM

Tuesday, January 05, 2021 9:40:09 AM

Post# of 50023
Actually, it is the most relevant point of the whole filing. As I stated in the past which you rejected, GDSI absolutely knew about the unpaid tax liabilities before the proposed closing date. Rontan's argument is that they waived the condition precedent of tax liabilities by insisting the deal close. That is not a crazy legal theory. However, the Quantum case is on point with that set of facts and concluded that Quantum could still get incidental damages.