Global Digital Solutions Inc (GDSI)

[Coreton]

I get a kick out of this new lawyer trying to use this “Damages” hearing to try to re-Litigate the findings of fact.

The default judgement accepts all of the prevailing parties pleadings as true and factual as a matter of law.

The court has already ruled for plaintiff on specific damages. The court has already ruled on plaintiffs entitlement for Damages Incidental. Those rulings are not open to re litigation in this hearing or this filing.

There was no evidence presented to contradict the courts previously adjudicated findings as a matter of law.


There was no evidence presented to contradict the amounts presented by plaintiff. The finding of fact in the default judgement establishes that figure at $290m+. Defendant can only present Proof beyond reasonable that plaintiff reasonable estimates are wrong. That was never done not even in this filing.

They attempt to shift the burden back to plaintiff which is not the burden at plaintiffs feet. It is the burden at Rontans feet.

$GDSI