InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 1414
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/18/2016

Re: None

Saturday, 12/26/2020 10:02:55 PM

Saturday, December 26, 2020 10:02:55 PM

Post# of 130530
It’s clear that depending on Koh’s ruling means the patents have never been read in full or just not understood.

In order to prosecute & be granted a patent, the application must contain the complete details necessary for a POSITA to recreate the patents...with the exception of the coding, the detail on how it works is clearly spelled out.

Apparently, according to social studies Koh, not only did the multiple patent examiners & attorneys failed to do their job, but also the multiple PTAB judges who listened to both companies present EVIDENCE to support their positions then ruled overwhelmingly 12 times in favor of VPLM that the patents were valid...I guess the USPTO is just propagating continual conspiracies against the Big tech companies by granting the little guys valid patents. But let’s keep complaining about China stealing our IP. SMFH!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News