Wednesday, December 16, 2020 6:10:23 PM
I think whoever did the data analysis (e.g. australian contractors?) have increased the sample on the interim analysis and thats problematic. You cant change your plan like that unless your trying to hide something.
They deserve credit for giving this a shot, no doubt. But don't manipulate the plan. It is indeed shady behaviour. They have shown us the almost full data but did so by increasing the sample to find signal.
If this type of change of the plan occurs in real scientific studies, they are disregarded and don't get published, or they have to state it as a limitation because of the potential for post hoc data manipulation.
Invest in the science.
PickleJar Debuts Nationwide Contest With Brian Kelley for Fans to Win a Three-Day Bahama Cruise • NREG • Jun 3, 2024 8:45 AM
ILUS Provides an Update on the Binding Term Sheet Signed with Actelis Networks (NASDAQ: ASNS) • ILUS • May 31, 2024 12:52 PM
Element79 Gold To Provide Summary and Update on Active Exploration Program, Community Relations at RMEC on June 4 • ELEM • May 30, 2024 1:18 PM
Branded Legacy Secures Exclusive Extraction Partnership with One of the World's Largest Kava Distributors and Producers • BLEG • May 30, 2024 8:30 AM
ECGI Holdings, Inc. Announces $2 Million Debt-to-Equity Conversion • ECGI • May 30, 2024 8:30 AM
North Bay Resources Reports Assays up to >25% Mg, 0.1% Ni, 0.1% Cu, 0.01% Co, 0.3 ppm Pt at Tulameen Platinum Project, British Columbia • NBRI • May 29, 2024 9:03 AM