Followers | 293 |
Posts | 4644 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 10/12/2008 |
Thursday, December 10, 2020 8:29:27 PM
Yes. Please review the arguments and questions found in the petitions.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/# - Scroll down to Wednesday, December 9.
Only in some legal carve-out, such as if FHFA is unconstitutional could or would they give backward looking remedy, but they all balked at the end per reporting that this would not be a good thing for SCOTUS to do here as it opens other SSA etc issues.
Yes, there was hesitancy. There was uncertainty. No decision has been made and the leanings made toward one side or another by the Justices are not ascertainable.
However SCOTUS decides the questions before it, there will be future legal consequences and economic impact not only for shareholders, the FHFA, and HERA, but also on other federal agencies and the housing economy. Contemplation of such consequences and impact is the base reason for Justices asking the questions they did, some of which were couched in hypothetical contexts and future outcomes. Lower courts will have to deal with the decisions made on the questions presented.
I guess we wait for Sweeney FCC
We wait.
Thanks
You are welcome.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM