Followers | 293 |
Posts | 4644 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 10/12/2008 |
Thursday, December 10, 2020 5:59:19 PM
It would seem that getting down to brass-tacks and excluding the legal questions of APA, Dismissed for cause, Acting director vs. appointed, and all that seem moot.
What they did was wrong.
I suppose the next "legalese" interpretation is that this is not the Federal Claims court (i.e. takings).
So, can the Supreme Court make any remedies for the non-FCC issues, given that they recognize it was ... just plain wrong?
No. Retrospective monetary remedies are not before SCOTUS.
See: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=159914350
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM