Ken Tapp founded and is the CEO of both Social Life Network and MJLink, as I know you're fully aware. Why do you think Ken Tapp stopped funding one of his subsidiaries that he personally created? Could it be simply because this is exactly what he planned to do, once MJLink started generating enough of it's own revenue? Also, who made the decision for Social Life Network to own 15% of MJLink? Could it have been Ken Tapp, since he founded & is the CEO of both companies? Why would Ken Tapp personally choose for Social Life Network (his company) to own 15% of MJLink's (also his company) shares? Could it be because 75% of the remaining shares is the perfect amount of shares to remain available so that MJLink will have the requisite amount of shares available to negotiate the pre planned merger, and subsequent joint venture that will create the Legal MJ Global Business Conglomerate, that's been in the planning stages for several years, in anticipation of the passing of legislations that will inevitably reclassify and Make MJ legal worldwide? The 15% ownership of MJLink shares by Social Life Network was not hidden information, that information was not buried deep in the website behind a partition. I scrolled down and saw that information last week, and that detail was plain as day for everyone to see. You performed your due diligence, saw 15%, assumed that it meant danger, and that everyone needed to be warned...fair enough. I performed my own due diligence, noticing the 15% last week & I saw something completely different. What I saw, what I still see, is the framework of a multiple, key player global conglomerate that will rival anything investors worldwide have ever seen...
