InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 3038
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/25/2020

Re: None

Tuesday, 12/08/2020 12:26:49 AM

Tuesday, December 08, 2020 12:26:49 AM

Post# of 797221
***BOOM***The shareholders issue a warning to the DOJ's Solicitor General.
The DOJ's question presented at Scotus about the anti-injunction or anti-judicial review, was already answered in the ruling of the 5th Circuit Court hearing en-banc: "It's inapplicable when the conservator acts beyond its powers, which is the NWS case." Besides, when he's asked by the Justices what remedies the UST and the FHFA approved after the ruling mentioned, the Solicitor General can't say that, with the 5th amendment to the purchase agreement of September 2019, FnF are retaining Capital, because that's false. There's an offset pending to be recorded in the balance sheet in the form of REDUCTION of the Retained Earnings account, once it's posted the true amount of SPS corresponding to the SPS increase each quarter since the 5th amendment, because, currently, it's posted a wrong amount.
The Solicitor General could face charges of abuse of Court process and perjury.