Tuesday, December 08, 2020 12:26:49 AM
The DOJ's question presented at Scotus about the anti-injunction or anti-judicial review, was already answered in the ruling of the 5th Circuit Court hearing en-banc: "It's inapplicable when the conservator acts beyond its powers, which is the NWS case." Besides, when he's asked by the Justices what remedies the UST and the FHFA approved after the ruling mentioned, the Solicitor General can't say that, with the 5th amendment to the purchase agreement of September 2019, FnF are retaining Capital, because that's false. There's an offset pending to be recorded in the balance sheet in the form of REDUCTION of the Retained Earnings account, once it's posted the true amount of SPS corresponding to the SPS increase each quarter since the 5th amendment, because, currently, it's posted a wrong amount.
The Solicitor General could face charges of abuse of Court process and perjury.
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM