InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 52
Posts 5678
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/28/2014

Re: PepsiMan post# 136010

Sunday, 12/06/2020 3:19:42 PM

Sunday, December 06, 2020 3:19:42 PM

Post# of 156804
I am thinking JL and DLM would be very shocked, and disappointed to find out Aasim was taking advantage of them. Them bringing him onto the board, though I feel was an error, was something they likely did out of trust and respect as well as determining there may be potential in what he may bring to the table down the road. Although there remains strong conjecture Akyumen is not what it is purported to be, the connection between the two is tenuous at best since there does not appear to be an exchange of financial instruments between the two nor reimbursement for services.

If I were JL and DLM I would ask on behalf of TTCM shareholders, Aasim to provide the location of his current manufacturing facility. We know the address is bogus as listed on Zoom because if it were a real location for Akyumen, he, Aasim and or his legal counsel, would have responded to the correspondence sent to his office, in his name and I think that is what JL and DLM must be thinking. I mean really, why would they risk some blowback at bringing him onto the board, and then keeping him there, after the information regarding California became public came to light. They must be convinced it was another Akyumen and another Aasim who did not pay back the loan/investment.; and were the subject of the cease and desist order. I wish for TTCM shareholders they were not remaining silent on the issue so it could be put in the past.