Post 120274 Honey: I'll be generous and just say that if it takes more money to get to FDA, then MDT pays more for the IP next time. Personally, I'm disappointed the license agreement was only for $10M. Should have been for 2x or 3x that. Here's food for thought.
It's possible that Mc negotiated a future additional sum as soon as the next batch of patents is awarded. Once awarded, each makes the company more valuable and thus more $$$ for the next license agreement for more than $10M.
Why would MDT license IP, pay for milestones, use the IP to fix their multi-port and then leave TMDI to swing in the wind with a beautiful SP, nearly finished and better than anything known to exist for RAS? Oh! I know! So you can tell everyone management sucks and the sp goes lower so you can flip a few hundred shares. I can't believe you really write this BS every week (sometimes more than once a week) thinking people who read this board will believe you.
I don't know why, but a group of somebody's just spent more than $20M buying more than 15 million shares of TMDI over the past 10 days. Do really think they are going to let TMDI fail? Those "somebody's" know once they started to raise the SP it would attract more "shorts." So they have more $$$ in reserve to buy more shares on the dips. The share price may drift without news. Notice I said "may." I really don't think it moves much lower. But its only my opinion. And I'm not trying to scare anyone.
Your speculation had more credibility when we were at $.70 than now. Those "somebody's" are going to make sure that we go for 10 days to meet the NASDAQ requirement and put it behind us. IMO. It's a big distraction for Mc. I prefer TMDI focus on completing milestones and get on with finishing ENOS. And staying on the NASDAQ keeps TMDI on the radar for other whales once the sp goes to $3, or $4, or becomes a MOMO play. All the more reason for those "somebody's" to make sure it goes for 10 days. I suffer b/c I can't predict the future, but my deductive reasoning is pretty good.
The only reason ENOS isn't going further, or faster is b/c all of ENOS engineering resources are working on fixing/upgrading/modifying MDT's multi-port. With our IP integrated into MDT's bot it will become the predicate for our FDA submission. Or, MDT will own us by then. How many companies has MDT partnered with and then just let them go to a competitor? Haven't they done this more than 50-60 times? This "$h!t isn't easy." Just ask MDT. If you think Mc's a failure? Who's getting the blame over at MDT?
I'm not asking for you to give up your personal crusade - just stop with the chicken-little sky-is-falling BS. The act is stale and annoying. And by comparison MDT's robot project is far worse than ours. We have a money issue, not IP. They don't have a money issue and can't make it work/compete with ISRG. So where's MDT's money going to fix their BIGGER robot issues? That's just my perspective.
Good luck to all. Regards,BK.
