![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Thursday, January 04, 2007 9:25:31 PM
It is my opinion that the only thing that happened is Loftwerks, Inc. (LFWK) did a name and symbol change with the SEC. They changed their name to Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd to match the Canadian Company name and they changed their symbol to SLJB. Both were available with the SEC and the change was made. Simple name and symbol change with no merger. The SPAC was never used after it was properly set up. As Gwik has said it was never funded, nothing was ever done in the SPAC after it was formed. Look at SOS of Nevada site.
https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=DxoEtEmuaADMWNYYM6GnHQ%253d%253d
One action/ammendment and that was the original articles of incorporation establishing the SPAC!
Why else would the OSC bring complaints against both entities. The Canadian Sulja was a private Canadian Company. No trading of any kind. Should only be involved post merger but that would be Sulja Nevada and the Canadian company should have been part of that entity! No reason to name them both unless they never merged! JMHO!
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Expands International Presence with New Partnership in Dubai • GRLF • Jun 24, 2024 8:30 AM
Bemax Inc. Positions to Capitalize on Industry Growth with New Improved Quality of Mother's Touch® Disposable Diapers • BMXC • Jun 24, 2024 8:00 AM
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM