InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 1586
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/25/2019

Re: subslover post# 6649

Friday, 11/13/2020 6:57:29 PM

Friday, November 13, 2020 6:57:29 PM

Post# of 6773
They released on Friday after all. There are some things good. I'm kinda disillusioned with the mgmt. But they put out these highlights:

Highlights of Q3 and YTD 2020 Include:

Grew YTD revenue to $8.8mm, up 13% from 2019*
Improved YTD gross margin to 68%, up from 53% in 2019*
Grew Q3 2020 Software revenue to $2.8mm, up 18% from 2019
Software revenue increased 6% QoQ, defying market headwinds
Generated Software Adjusted EBITDA1 of $1.0mm in Q3 2020, an 868% increase from 2019
Overall Adjusted EBITDA for Q3 was $95K, the third straight quarter of positive Adjusted EBITDA, despite one-time costs
Overall Software gross margin YTD was 74%, a 14% improvement over 2019
Completed the divestiture of the Security Guarding business, creating a streamlined, pure play technology value proposition
Continued to strengthen balance sheet with $1.7mm in cash and a $1mm decrease in liabilities QoQ
Launched the nation’s first all-electronic medical marijuana patient reciprocity program in New Mexico

Just skimming, what they left out is the $40M impairment charge. That shows how much they've been overpaying for things over the years. They left that Goodwill at $9M.

They don't break out the cash flows for the third quarter, which is annoying. But they still lose cash from operations. A lot better looking than KERN, to be fair. On all metrics from a glance. Even dilution.

And speaking of dilution, they really diluted their shareholders, making all the good null and void in my eyes. I'm kinda mad about all that toxic financing as I see it. So I don't trust them.

But, yes they strengthened the balance sheet. But failed to reach positive cash flows from operations. Even while increasing their margins, which is a dissappointment. So they need the $10M which they claim to be getting if the deal goes through. And from there, it gets very murky and a surrender of ownership.

So, I'd liek to be out myself at .35. But that's just me. I could be wrong. I want blue waters over there at IVFH. Just simple. And a lot more sales with a whole lost less shares, and without this RUDE diluion. Their adjusted EBITDA is where they choose to go for a measure of clash flows, which sidesteps the very real painful dilution. The statement of cash flows is a better plays to go for that. And that's not broken out for Q3, but it can't be positive as I see it for a net loss of $700K or thereabouts if memory serves correct for the last 9 months. Again, looks great to KERN in my opinion. But, it's not sustainable. So they still have to keep going to market for cash. Which means, more dilution, and I sure can't trust Scott Ogur in that dept. anymore for building shareholder value.

Pardon me if I'm a little angry with these guys. I expected more from Garis Toler. And that may be where Weiss Law is coming from and wanting an investigation. Because, yes, the waters are muddy. I don't feel like Zac is very forthcoming on our conference calls. I hope he changes his attitude in that area in the next one, assuming one may be coming on Monday.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.