InvestorsHub Logo

kpf

Followers 5
Posts 2509
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/06/2003

kpf

Re: wbmw post# 36560

Wednesday, 01/03/2007 3:21:16 PM

Wednesday, January 03, 2007 3:21:16 PM

Post# of 151692
wbmw, fingolfen, alan

At the end things are really very simple: I said Intel built four 65nm fabs, while it built only three 90nm fabs. Nothing less and nothing more.

I provided evidence for this statement.

Best of luck for any further attempts to convince yourselves four is not really four, but more like three. Apologies I won't be of any help in this respect, though. Additions within a range of one hand's fingers is one of my limited talents which i don't want to lose. :)

You have not answered WBMW's post regarding actual sq. ft. of fab space, market size growth, and die size growth...

Sure I did not. And i am not going into cadence-loops as well.
All I needed to prove was four fabs have been built. Because this was all I claimed.

K.












Facts are irrelevant to the emotional brain

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INTC News