InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 111
Posts 11523
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/21/2006

Re: stockfan100 post# 29543

Monday, 11/02/2020 4:05:38 PM

Monday, November 02, 2020 4:05:38 PM

Post# of 32138
I can help here =)

Bottomline...If defendants could dismiss the case they would have done it during the last 11 years to avoid millions of dollars attorney fees.



Whoever said the defendants spent "millions of dollars attorney fees" That's another fiction.

Reality says the following-

10-21-2020 Filed order: Order Granting Stipulated Motion for Dismissal
With Prejudice
Judge KARA PETTIT
Signed October 21, 2020


Judge Pettit denied defendants' Summay Judgement that asked to end this case earlier...That is a fact!



It's a "fact" that Percy claimed this in SECI's UN-audited non-SEC reporting financial statements, but the Judge admonished Percy 'n posse for "misconstruing" and "misinterpreting" the dismissal of the IP case in 2018, 2019 respectively.

10:56 AM First, the Court notes that Sector 10
misinterprets and misconstrues the Court's oral ruling and
the written memorialization of that ruling on Defendants'
motions for summary judgment in October 2018 and February
2019. The Court considered all of the Defendants'
briefing. as well as Sector 10's responses thereto, and
granted all of the Defendants' motions for summary judgment
on the trade secret issues and related claims, and its
ruling was not solely with respect to Dutro's motion for
summary judgment.



The fact that the case was settled just a few days before the trial start is an indication that a SETTLEMENT was reached to avoid the trial by defendants!



Counsel provide update. Parties are attempting to resolve
the case, offer made by Sector 10.


Winning parties don't make offers.

The End