ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RECONSIDER
3RD DISTRICT COURT
SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH
SECTOR 10 HOLDINGS INC Et al, MINUTES
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RECONSIDER
vs. Case No: 119907606 DC
LEE ALLEN Et al, Judge: KARA PETTIT
Defendant. Date: September 29, 2020
Clerk: katherf
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
PRESENT
Plaintiff's Attorney(s): KARRA PORTER
Plaintiff's Attorney(s): PATRICIA KUENDIG
Defendant's Attorney(s): AARON BERGMAN
Defendant's Attorney(s): DEBORAH CHANDLER
Defendant's Attorney(s): THATCHER RAHMEIER
Defendant's Attorney(s): FRANCES DIGIOVANNI
Defendant's Attorney(s): JORDAN BLEDSOE
Defendant's Attorney(s): KENNETH BLACK
Audio
Tape Number: W35 Tape Count: 10:00-11:00
HEARING
10:00 AM The above-entitled case comes before the Court for telephonic oral argument on Plaintiffs'
Motion for Revision of Nonfinal Ruling, filed 7/20/2020.
09-29-2020 07:11 PM Page 1 of 3
The Order of the Court is stated below:
Dated: September 29,
2020
/s/ KARA PETTIT
07:11:57 PM District Court Judge
10:02 AM Ms. Porter presents argument on the motion.
10:16 AM Mr. Bergman with response.
10:34 AM Mr. Rahmeier with response.
10:40 AM Mr. Bledsoe with response.
10:41 AM Ms. Porter with reply.
10:53 AM The Court takes the matter under advisement and will issue an oral ruling.
10:56 AM First, the Court notes that Sector 10 misinterprets and misconstrues the Court's oral ruling
and the written memorialization of that ruling on Defendants' motions for summary judgment in
October 2018 and February 2019. The Court considered all of the Defendants' briefing. as well as
Sector 10's responses thereto, and granted all of the Defendants' motions for summary judgment on
the trade secret issues and related claims, and its ruling was not solely with respect to Dutro's motion
for summary judgment. The Court declines to exercise discretion to reconsider its prior rulings on
the summary judgment motions because (1) the matter is not being presented in a new or different
light, (2) there has not been a change in the governing law, (3) there has not been the discovery of
new evidence, and (4) the Court does not have a conviction that the prior decision was clearly
erroneous based upon the record and arguments made before it on the motions for summary
judgment in October 2018, and Sector 10 either did or could have raised the arguments at that time.
Therefore, for the reasons set forth on the record, which are incorporated herein by reference, the
Court denies the motion to reconsider.
This is the Order of the Court.
End Of Order - Signature at the Top of the First Page
09-29-2020 07:11 PM Page 2 of
CASE NUMBER: 119907606 Debt Collection
3
CERTIFICATE OF NOTIFICATION
I certify that a copy of the attached document was sent to the following people for case 119907606
by the method and on the date specified.
EMAIL: BRAD BEARNSON
EMAIL: AARON BERGMAN
EMAIL: KENNETH BLACK
EMAIL: JORDAN BLEDSOE
EMAIL: THOMAS BOWMAN
EMAIL: DEBORAH CHANDLER
EMAIL: FRANCES DIGIOVANNI
EMAIL: BROOKE JOHNSON
EMAIL: PATRICIA KUENDIG
EMAIL: MARK J LEE
EMAIL: KARRA PORTER
EMAIL: THATCHER RAHMEIER
EMAIL: AUBRI THOMAS
EMAIL: JOEL ZENGER
09/29/20 /s/ KATHERINE FAIRCHILD
Date: ____________________ ______________________________
Signature
09-29-2020 07:11 PM Page 3 of
CASE NUMBER: 119907606 Debt Collection
3
