InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 1139
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/27/2006

Re: wjlknew post# 4231

Tuesday, 01/02/2007 4:13:58 PM

Tuesday, January 02, 2007 4:13:58 PM

Post# of 6489
It was removed because it was clearly a twisting of the facts and your response was removed because it was not relevent since the bashing post was removed.

The stock incentive package is old news while the passing of the plan was new, anyone that thought the results were important to their investment could have easily monitored SEC filings in several ways. The easiest would have been to sign up for updates from Insmed website.

There was no rest of the story, the SEC filing speaks for itself. It is what it is and does not require defending. It has also been beat to death on Yahoo and IV. If a oneliner had stated that the filing was made it would have stood.

There has not been any news of value since the Kobe announcement and there was little discussion about that so why the need for messages now. If you want to chat or argue go to Yahoo or IV. If you don't want an uncluttered board and want to see all the garbage and choose then again stick with Yahoo. All the post today including mine are nothing but clutter and Robin should remove all of them. I will let the ones today stand even though they contribute nothing as far as our investment.

This is the Insmed investors board, not the trading board, the short board, the bagholders board or a chat room. This board is for the quality of messages not the quantity. Quality messages should provide a link to the source if the intent is to share facts and research to help investors to be better informed about Insmed.

Rod

Never argue with a fool, for after awhile, it becomes difficult to determine which is the fool.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INSM News