InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 7644
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 04/22/2010

Re: None

Wednesday, 10/28/2020 9:17:55 AM

Wednesday, October 28, 2020 9:17:55 AM

Post# of 50022
I have to admit that I really believe that GDSI's attorneys filed the recent motion to motivate the court to make a decision. Procedurally, it doesn't make sense. The default judgment was granted. You can't then at this stage ask for admissions from the defendants once the default is granted. In other words, GDSI's attorneys are asking for the cake and they want to eat it too. I'm guessing this is a legal trick to motivate the court to rule on damages. I don't see the court granting this motion. My guess as I've said is the court rules on damages and denies the Motion for Hearing as moot and possibly saying to GDSI in the order that they can pursue the admissions in another way by asking for a post trial deposition if they chose. I could make a case that if the court grants the motion, it is not good news for GDSI