InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 366
Posts 10142
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/06/2005

Re: nycjgalt post# 232217

Monday, 01/01/2007 1:28:29 PM

Monday, January 01, 2007 1:28:29 PM

Post# of 311063
Quick comment - thanks - and to respond to grashelm - nothing in life is easy and most success comes with high risk and high odds. I do believe if you do your best and work hard, you can narrow all that risk. In stocks, it is with DD and diversification.

As for his comment that the odds are long that Petar and associates "do the right thing," I agree. But, OTOH, if you ascribe to basic human logic, you have to think that they are, despite protests otherwise, sweating some major "bullets" at this point.

I will reiterate that, assuming they are not totally lying and stealing, lawyers can fashion something that benefits "victims," and the victim here being the company in my opinion, if deals and businesses and revenue streams and assets are not as represented. Further, if there was personal benefit, as opposed to corporate SLJB benefit, that benefit can be traced and, as part of any settlement, put back into the company.

It's complicated and everyone won't be happy. Yes, I agree it's a long shot, but it's the only shot that shareholders have in my opinion. The SEC or the OSC may get us that vengence. Class Action guys will get legal fees. I don't think message board vitriol will get us anything.

Again, just my opinion.