Thursday, October 15, 2020 11:18:35 PM
However, you simply cannot cherry pick the best interval regardless of thickness from each hole, hundreds or thousands of feet apart, on different geological structures, and come up with a single assay value for the whole "deposit". Unless your actuary friend has some basic geological knowledge, he won't find anything wrong with PT's averaging.
He probably does understand the concept of weighted averaging. But he won't know anything about geology, and how fraudulent that averaging was, from a technical sense.
What exactly did he focus on in his review?
Do your own research, use third-party sources, and don't buy into the hype.
Recent MXSG News
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 06/28/2023 01:47:39 PM
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM