Thursday, October 15, 2020 10:52:05 AM
No, that's not what he meant. The sentence that footnote 6 is attached to reads:
This option that Layton lays out (a "Strongly Progressive Government-Centric Model") involves eliminating the existing commons completely. He thinks it might be "desirable for [the juniors] to be eliminated in some fashion to reduce possible legal risks" as well, but the legal risks he is referring to are those involved in making FnF completely government-owned.
Glidelogic Corp. Announces Revolutionary AI-Generated Content Copyright Protection Solution • GDLG • Jul 26, 2024 12:30 PM
Southern Silver Files NI43-101 Technical Report for its Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Cerro Las Minitas Project • SSV • Jul 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM