InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,460.48
(
-0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,181.60
(
-0.43%
)
Dow Jones
39,118.86
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
84.85
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,753.60
(
0.73%
)
Post# of 8307
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

CDrucker

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 80
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/27/2005

CDrucker

Re: None

Saturday, 12/30/2006 10:22:26 AM

Saturday, December 30, 2006 10:22:26 AM

Post# of 8307
I recently came to understand that in the June 05 trial Anchor's ex-ceo's testimony included some things that the government is using in its defense. Such as that the sale of RFC would not harm Anchor's future profitability, that RFC was sold to meet risk-based capital requirements and not for the the breach in usage of supervisory goodwill, and that he was happy with the sale price Anchor got for RFC.

Does anyone else have knowledge of this and/or our side's rebuttal to it? I know we presented documents & evidence supporting the contrary, but I would still like to know if we specifically shot down this testimony used by the defendant.




Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up