InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 89
Posts 6856
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/18/2009

Re: None

Saturday, 10/10/2020 11:01:13 PM

Saturday, October 10, 2020 11:01:13 PM

Post# of 43375
RobinX, whom I think may be an oncologist, just opined that he/she thinks the preventive quality of lenz may be in regards to preventing hyper-inflammation which could lead to cytokine storm. I don't disagree. Due to the current times, it may be a more spectacular headline to claim that lenz can be used to prevent Covid. But, in reality, it is far more significant to discover and report that lenz can be used as a preventative to the development of hyper-inflammation, which leads to cytokine storm.

What could be a fair headline, though, if we wanted to capitalize on the Covid market, might be to announce that lenz could be used to significantly reduce Covid deaths. Mayo Clinic found, and Durrant stated in his Tucker interview, that the Mayo Study reported mortality was reduced 80%. I hope that our Phase III interim analysis reports a reduction even better than that, hopefully over the 90% mark that I've heard mentioned by competitors.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/potential-breakthrough-coronavirus-treatment/vi-BB19FOgW

What I don't understand is how the lero medical consulting doctor only found GM-CSF in 33% of the Covid patients he studied. I know some people who interpret that to mean that lenz is too narrow in scope. I can only assume that it means that the disease had not fully advanced, or was not severe enough to cause hyper-inflammation. And I have to assume that there were no deaths in the consulting doctor's study.

Why? Because Durrant told Tucker Carlson that it was the inflammation that caused Covid deaths, not the virus itself. And if I understand things correctly, the immune system of all the Covid patients who died had produced excessive white blood cells (GM-CSF) that caused the inflammation.

So, is it fair to say that 100% of the autopsies of the deceased Covid patients would show GM-CSF? I hope my question doesn't reflect such an elemental understanding that it doesn't even make sense. My chief concern in asking is to make sure people know that lenz is not too narrow in scope. Or, conversely, to learn that lenz may, in fact, be too narrow in scope. I don't see how it could be, if it prevents cytokine storm.







Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.