InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 55
Posts 6761
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/18/2016

Re: GAK- post# 634026

Thursday, 09/24/2020 4:04:21 PM

Thursday, September 24, 2020 4:04:21 PM

Post# of 799641

The BOD has NO fiduciary responsibility to Pfd shareholders. It's fiduciary responsibility is to the common shareholders.



False. During conservatorship they don't have fiduciary duties to any shareholders, common or preferred. And once the fiduciary duties are restored they will apply to all shareholders, common and preferred.

And, as long as the government is the primary shareholder (in FHFA) or the largest shareholder (under the 79% warrants), we can expect the decisions that are made to be made in the best interest of the Common Shareholder



That's Ackman's thesis, and he has hedged with quite a few prefs in case he is wrong. The specific phrase he used was "it hedges our risk of a restructuring that disproportionately benefits the preferred versus the common shares". He knows that's a possibility even with Treasury's warrant stake.

Just be careful of an outcome like Treasury selling the warrants to a third party, at which point they will no longer care about the share price, or Treasury converting the seniors to commons, when their interests suddenly oppose those of current common shareholders.

Also, Treasury trying to maximize its return does not necessarily mean trying to maximize the common share price. If they just want the most money possible they will monetize the seniors, which would crush the existing commons utterly.

Got legal theories no plaintiff has tried? File your own lawsuit or shut up.