InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 22
Posts 999
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/23/2017

Re: mblifer post# 14784

Tuesday, 09/15/2020 12:23:28 AM

Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:23:28 AM

Post# of 34283
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2018/lr24232.htm

IMO... There were great rumors about the health of Roger Duffield being very bad making it difficult for him to lead the company. I believe those rumors are very true. JMHO...but I also believe that in order to resolve/ settle the legal issues he’s had with SEC investigation noted above, there may have been strong encouragement from legal and supportive minds representing him along with agreement from SEC to lessen punishments for limiting further involvement with publicly traded companies. Yet Another possibility is to ensure the survival of Protext and his legacy he may have severed its ties from PLPL for fear of Protext being a part of all assets being taken in its Defunct nature. They’ve pretty much lost everything. Keeping 10M shares of TXTM for posterity and to enjoy in its future success in some manner. Once again, JMHO. I also know for sure that there were many large Protext Pharma shareholders who reached out to the company demanding this sort of action be taken when the Sec investigation began. Separation was an inevitability especially if his health began to fail. There are many plausible reasons why he may have been pushed to do what he did but one thing is for sure..... He did it. I hope this at least gives you pause and reason to believe. Tweets by Protext weeks ago are considered official and I suspect they will clear the air very soon for PLPL shareholders so they know what they own or (don’t own).