InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 125
Posts 7401
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/03/2017

Re: rattlestock post# 145659

Thursday, 09/10/2020 9:44:34 AM

Thursday, September 10, 2020 9:44:34 AM

Post# of 164026
Hahaha.... This is all fine/dandy, but has absolutely zero impact on what's going to happen with this case; and for whatever it's worth, what I'm actually thinking is "what you've obviously wasted time putting together, means nothing and changes nothing."

You are trying sooooo hard to spin this in a way that this law suit is not looking good for VYST, when that couldn't be further from the truth. Lets take an even deeper dive into recent filings and/or what they actually mean, shall we?

1. The magistrate Judge Gorenstein, not Judge Carter, denied Vystar's request for discovery. Vystar is filing an objection to that ruling, to be reviewed by Judge Carter, which they have a very good chance of winning.

2. If their objection and/or request for discovery is approved, this case is as good as done, and ema is screwed. EMA would immediately contact Vystar to pay/settle (so fast their heads will spin), as they will do/say/pay anything to avoid having to show under the hood. If discovery is approved, ema is not only burnt in this suit, but also the dozens of others they're currently involved in, and they'll do anything to avoid it.

3. If Vystar's objection is denied, it still will NOT have any impact on the final result of this case. The only thing it would do is drag this case out a little longer, but the end result will still be the same...... ema loses.

Keep trying......


Geewillikers, you are probably like me now and asking yourself, why did they do this?? Or why was I told different?

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VYST News