InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 4251
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/02/2008

Re: None

Tuesday, 09/08/2020 10:57:52 PM

Tuesday, September 08, 2020 10:57:52 PM

Post# of 38845
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_compression#History

In January 2016, TMMI announced that it was abandoning fractal-based technology altogether.

What difference does it make now who ended up with which codec

During the 1990s Iterated Systems Inc. and its partners expended considerable resources to bring fractal compression to video. While compression results were promising, computer hardware of that time lacked the processing power for fractal video compression to be practical beyond a few select usages. Up to 15 hours were required to compress a single minute of video.

In 1996, Iterated Systems Inc. announced[25] an alliance with the Mitsubishi Corporation to market ClearVideo to their Japanese customers. The original ClearVideo 1.2 decoder driver is still supported[26] by Microsoft in Windows Media Player although the encoder is no longer supported.

Two firms, Total Multimedia Inc. and Dimension, both claim to own or have the exclusive licence to Iterated's video technology, but neither has yet released a working product. The technology basis appears to be Dimension's U.S. patents 8639053 and 8351509, which have been considerably analyzed.[27] In summary, it is a simple quadtree block-copying system with neither the bandwidth efficiency nor PSNR quality of traditional DCT-based codecs. In January 2016, TMMI announced that it was abandoning fractal-based technology altogether.

Numerous research papers have been published during the past few years discussing possible solutions to improve fractal algorithms and encoding hardware.[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]

FREEBIRD7/2/1977
TICKET